World Cup 2026: Only Two of Ten Favourites Made the Final
Which World Cup 2026 favourites got into trouble? Eight of the top ten title picks fell short, from Germany's shootout exit to Brazil's last-16 defeat.
Of the ten teams the market made genuine World Cup 2026 favourites, only Spain (16% title odds) and Argentina (12%) reached the final, a goalless contest between the two highest-priced sides in the tournament. The other eight all fell, and some of them spectacularly: Germany and the Netherlands were gone before the last 16, Brazil lost in it, and Uruguay never made it out of their group.
This was a tournament in which pedigree offered no protection. The favourites who struggled did so in different ways: a couple were ambushed on penalties after dominating their groups, one of the pre-tournament second-favourites was out-run by a dark horse, and the biggest name of all simply failed to perform when it mattered. Even the giants who went deep, France and England, ended up contesting a third-place playoff rather than lifting the trophy.
This is the casualty list: who fell, when, and why the odds counted for so little once the knockouts began.
Ad
Which favourites got into trouble, and when?
Rank the ten shortest-priced teams and the carnage is clear. Spain (16%) and Argentina (12%) survived to the final. Of the rest, France (12%) reached the semi-finals, England (10%) finished third, Brazil (11%) went out in the last 16, Germany (8%) and the Netherlands (6%) exited in the round of 32, Portugal (7%) fell in the last 16, Uruguay (4%) crashed out in the group stage, and Morocco (3.5%) reached the quarter-finals.
The pattern is instructive. The deeper you went down the favourites list, the less it predicted the outcome: Morocco, the lowest-priced of the ten, outlasted five teams rated above them. Meanwhile the biggest disappointments clustered at the top, where expectation was heaviest. Brazil at 11% and Uruguay at 4% both underperformed badly against their billing.
What united the fallers was fragility at the knockout threshold. Germany and the Netherlands each topped their group with a +6 goal difference, as commanding a group-stage showing as anyone managed, yet neither survived their first knockout tie. Group-stage dominance, it turned out, was no guide to who could win a one-off eliminator.
Germany and the Netherlands: the shootout casualties
No two exits summed up the cruelty of the knockouts better than Germany and the Netherlands, both eliminated in the round of 32 and both on penalties. Germany, the 8% fifth-favourites built around Florian Wirtz and Jamal Musiala, won Group E with six points and a +6 goal difference, then drew 1-1 with Paraguay and lost the shootout 4-3. The Netherlands, at 6%, won Group F on seven points with the same +6 margin, drew 1-1 with Morocco, and went out 3-2 on spot-kicks.
These were not sides that limped into the knockouts. Both had been among the most convincing teams of the group phase, scoring freely and conceding little. That is what made the exits so jarring: there was no slow decline, just a single tie that turned on the finest of margins. For the Oranje, it was a continuation of a maddening knockout history; for Germany, confirmation that their group form masked a brittleness under pressure.
The common thread was an inability to kill a tie inside 90 minutes. Both drew 1-1, both squandered the control they had shown over three group games, and both were punished from 12 yards. In a tournament where the shootout became a recurring executioner, two of the pre-tournament top six were among its first and most prominent victims.
Brazil's early exit: out-run by Norway
Brazil arrived as the 11% second-favourites, Carlo Ancelotti's Seleo chasing a sixth star, and their group stage suggested the hype was warranted: top of Group C on seven points with a +6 goal difference. A 2-1 win over Japan in the round of 32 kept the momentum going. Then, in the last 16, they ran into Norway and lost 2-1.
It was the defining upset of the early knockouts. Norway, ranked 31st and priced at just 2%, had Erling Haaland leading the line and the belief to match Brazil blow for blow. Vinícius Jnior finished the tournament with four goals, tied among the leading scorers, but Brazil's attack could not rescue them once Norway found a route back into the tie. For a nation that measures every tournament against the trophy, a last-16 exit was a failure regardless of the margin.
Brazil's fall carried extra weight because of who inflicted it. Norway went on to reach the quarter-finals, so this was no fluke from an overmatched opponent, but it still represented one of the biggest rank-gap defeats of the round. The second-favourites were home before the quarter-finals, and the title race lost arguably its most glamorous name early.
Uruguay: the favourite who never left the group
If Brazil's exit was a shock, Uruguay's was an embarrassment. Marcelo Bielsa's intense, high-pressing Celeste were priced at 4%, inside the top ten, and were widely tipped as a side nobody would want to draw. Instead they finished third in Group H on two points with a -1 goal difference, eliminated before a single knockout ball was kicked.
The context makes it worse. Group H was topped by Spain on seven points, but second place went to Cape Verde, the tournament's smallest debutant nation, on three. Uruguay finished behind the Blue Sharks and only narrowly ahead of Saudi Arabia on goal difference. For a country with Uruguay's World Cup heritage and a coach of Bielsa's reputation, being out-pointed by a first-time qualifier was a stunning indictment.
Uruguay were the clearest example of a favourite whose billing bore no relation to its performance. Two points from three games is a group-stage return associated with the tournament's makeweights, not a side the market rated above the likes of Belgium and Morocco. Of all the contenders who struggled, none fell further below their expected level, or earlier.
France and England: deepest of the fallers, but still short
Not every favourite who struggled went out early. France (12%) and England (10%) were the two biggest names to reach the final four, yet both ended up disappointed. France topped Group I with a maximum nine points and a +8 goal difference, then saw off Sweden 3-0, Paraguay 1-0 and Morocco 2-0 before losing 2-0 to Spain in the semi-final. England won Group L, beat DR Congo 2-1, edged Mexico 3-2, got past Norway in the quarter-finals and lost 1-2 to Argentina in the last four.
The two then met in the third-place playoff, a fixture neither wanted to be in, and produced the game of the tournament: England won it 6-4. Kylian Mbapp finished as the competition's outright top scorer with ten goals, and Ousmane Dembl added six, yet all that French firepower could not get past Spain when it counted. For Mbapp, the Golden Boot was scant consolation for a second straight World Cup that ended in defeat.
England's case is more nuanced. Jude Bellingham (seven goals) and Harry Kane (six) drove Thomas Tuchel's side to a semi-final and a playoff win, their deepest run in years, but the target was always the trophy and 60 years of hurt go on. Both nations outperformed most of the fallen giants in terms of rounds survived; both, measured against double-digit title odds, still came up short.
What the fallen favourites had in common
Strip the exits down and three themes recur. The first is the penalty shootout: Germany and the Netherlands, two of the top six, were both eliminated from the spot after failing to win in normal time. In a knockout bracket this unforgiving, the teams that could not finish a job inside 90 minutes paid for it, and pedigree offered no insurance at 12 yards.
The second is the gap between group form and knockout nous. Germany, the Netherlands and Brazil all topped their groups with healthy goal differences, and all three were gone by the last 16. Dominating three group matches against a seeded draw proved almost nothing about surviving a single tie against a motivated outsider such as Paraguay, Morocco or Norway.
The third is simple underperformance. Uruguay never escaped their group; Portugal, at 7%, bowed out in the last 16 after a 0-1 defeat to Spain in what was likely Cristiano Ronaldo's farewell. The one genuine success among the shorter-priced sides was Morocco, who at just 3.5% reached the quarter-finals before losing 2-0 to France, overachieving where bigger names folded. In the end only Spain and Argentina, the two most-backed teams of all, justified their odds by reaching the final, proof that in 2026 the favourites were far more fragile than their prices suggested.
Frequently asked
Which favourites went out in the group stage at World Cup 2026?
Uruguay were the only top-ten title favourite eliminated in the group stage, finishing third in Group H on two points with a goal difference of -1. At 4% pre-tournament odds, it was the tournament's most damaging flop relative to expectation.
How did Germany get knocked out of World Cup 2026?
Germany won Group E with six points and a +6 goal difference but lost a round-of-32 penalty shootout 4-3 to Paraguay after a 1-1 draw. It was a brutal early exit for the 8% fifth-favourites.
Did Brazil reach the knockouts at World Cup 2026?
Yes. Brazil topped Group C on seven points and beat Japan 2-1 in the round of 32, but lost 2-1 to Norway in the last 16 despite Vinícius Júnior's four goals across the tournament.
Who were the two favourites left standing in the final?
Spain (16% odds) and Argentina (12%), the top two in the title market, contested the final, which ended 0-0. They were the only two of the ten pre-tournament favourites to reach it.
Did any big favourite meet expectations at World Cup 2026?
Morocco, priced at just 3.5%, reached the quarter-finals and matched their 2022 semi-final pedigree before losing 2-0 to France, overachieving rather than disappointing.